Skip to start of page content

Email us about this page      Printer-friendly version of this page

Average Gross Household Income
2008

June 2008

Introduction

This research monitor details estimates of gross household income before tax (including investment income and welfare payments) down to the ward level. The information is derived from the 'Paycheck' system, which is managed by the private sector consultancy group CACI. This is the seventh research monitor that utilises this data source, and all the previous articles are in the research monitor archive.

The Paycheck Model

Paycheck uses information on millions of households from CACI's lifestyle database, along with census and market research data to increase reliability. This allows robust household income figures to be produced for Lancashire districts and wards.

Lancashire County Council has acquired the 2008 gross household income details for all the wards in the county and the 14 authorities within the Lancashire NUTS-2 area. The information has been selectively used in this report to highlight areas of wealth and income deprivation within the county.

Figure 1 Average Household Income, 2008, Lancashire Districts
Bar chart showing the mean gross household income for each of Lancashire's local authorities - see text for details
Note The Lancashire figure is for Lancashire NUTS-2.
Source CACI

Lancashire Results


For the Lancashire County Council (NUTS-3) administrative area, which excludes Blackburn with Darwen and Blackpool Unitary Authorities, average household income for 2008 was £32,400. The Lancashire NUTS-2 area, which includes the two unitary authorities, recorded a lower average of £31,800. In comparison, the North West average for 2008 was £32,200 whilst the GB figure was £34,400.

Figure 1 ranks the CACI results for each local authority in the county. Ribble Valley is the most prosperous authority with Chorley in second place. South Ribble in 2007 moved ahead of Fylde into third place, but the two districts have again changed positions in 2008. These are the four Lancashire authorities that recorded average income levels that were in excess of the national figure.

In the previous edition of this monitor, Hyndburn occupied the fifth lowest position in Lancashire and Pendle was in the second lowest place. The 2008 results however have seen these two authorities swop places, but the movements are not that significant since the differences in the average income figures for Pendle, Burnley, Blackburn with Darwen and Hyndburn were relatively small. Blackpool continues to occupy the bottom place and was the only area to have an average of under £29,000.

Table 1 Average Gross Household Income, 2008
  Average Gross Income Percentage Change 2007 to 2008
     
Ribble Valley Under £38,000 4.6%
Chorley Under £36,000 2.3%
Fylde Under £35,000 2.0%
South Ribble Under £35,000 0.9%
West Lancashire Under £34,000 3.9%
Rossendale Under £33,000 2.5%
Wyre Under £32,000 2.8%
Preston Under £31,000 -0.8%
Lancaster Under £31,000 0.8%
Pendle Under £30,000 1.8%
Burnley Under £30,000 1.6%
Hyndburn Under £30,000 -0.8%
     
Lancashire County (NUTS-3) £32,400 1.6%
     
Blackburn with Darwen Under £30,000 0.4%
Blackpool Under £29,000 1.1%
     
Lancashire NUTS-2 £31,800 1.5%
     
North West £32,200
Great Britain £34,400
Note 2007 figures were not obtained for the North West and Great Britain.
Source CACI

Household income information measures wealth by area of residence therefore the more urbanised districts are likely to see some of the wealth generated in their area lost to the more rural districts that are popular with commuters. The inward migration of wealthy retired/semi-retired individuals will also augment a district's average gross income figure.

The rural Ribble Valley district is a popular commuter location. West Lancashire is a good base for commuting to Merseyside, whilst Rossendale benefits from its location to the north of Manchester. Chorley and South Ribble are suitable locations for commuters to either Manchester or Preston. In contrast, commuting patterns work against areas such as Blackpool, Blackburn, Burnley and Preston.

Average Gross Household Incomes at the Ward Level

Gross household income data at the ward level was released for the first time in 2004 for 2001 Census of Population ward boundaries. The 2004-2008 figures therefore are compatible, but prior to 2004 previous editions of this research monitor used ward data based on 1991 ward boundaries.

Figure 2 Ward Income Levels by Broad Groups, 2008
Map showing the mean gross household income for each of Lancashire's wards - see text for details
Source CACI
Top Locks, Leeds and Liverpool Canal, Pennine Ward, Chorley District
Photograph of the Leeds and Liverpool Canal's Top Locks in the Pennine ward of Chorley district

For the 2008 ward results, the Pennine ward in Chorley district, with an average in excess of £49,000, retains its position of having the highest average income in Lancashire (Table 2). In second place was Wilpshire, which is in the Ribble Valley just to the north of Blackburn. North Turton with Tockholes (a predominantly rural area to the south of Blackburn) was in second place, whilst Brindle with Hoghton, also in Chorley district, was fourth.

The nine wards with the highest average income figures were all in either Blackburn with Darwen, Chorley and Ribble Valley. In general terms, the majority of the most affluent wards in the county are in the rural areas close to the major urban centres. These represent popular areas for commuting to the core urban areas in Lancashire and to Manchester and Liverpool. To the north of the county around Lancaster, the rural wards are somewhat more isolated and do not benefit to such a large extent from affluent commuters.

Table 2 The 20 Wards with the Highest Average Gross Household Income in Lancashire NUTS-2, Spring 2008
Lancashire Ranking Ward Local Authority Average Income
       
1 Pennine Chorley Over £49,000
2 Wilpshire Ribble Valley Over £47,000
3 North Turton with Tockholes Blackburn with Darwen Over £46,000
4 Brindle and Hoghton Chorley Over £46,000
5 Fernhurst Blackburn with Darwen Over £45,000
6 Whalley Ribble Valley Over £45,000
7 Billington and Old Langho Ribble Valley Over £43,000
8 Beardwood with Lammack Blackburn with Darwen Over £43,000
9 Wiswell and Pendleton Ribble Valley Over £43,000
10 Preston Rural North Preston Over £43,000
11 Garrison Preston Over £43,000
12 Ribby-with-Wrea Fylde Over £43,000
13 Clayton-le-Woods and Whittle-le-Woods Chorley Over £43,000
14 Parbold West Lancashire Over £42,000
15 Heath Charnock and Rivington Chorley Over £42,000
16 Lea Preston Over £42,000
17 Singleton and Greenhalgh Fylde Over £42,000
18 Blacko and Higherford Pendle Over £41,000
19 Newburgh West Lancashire Over £41,000
20 Broad Oak South Ribble Over £41,000
Source CACI

Table 3 The 20 Wards with the Lowest Average Gross Household Income in Lancashire NUTS-2, Spring 2008
Lancashire Ranking Ward Local Authority Average Income
       
282 Pharos Wyre Under £25,000
283 Shear Brow Blackburn with Darwen Under £25,000
284 Sudell Blackburn with Darwen Under £25,000
285 Birch Green West Lancashire Under £25,000
286 Clifton Blackpool Under £24,000
287 Little Harwood Blackburn with Darwen Under £24,000
288 Bank Hall Burnley Under £24,000
289 Town Centre Preston Under £24,000
290 Shadsworth with Whitebirk Blackburn with Darwen Under £24,000
291 Spring Hill Hyndburn Under £24,000
292 St George's Preston Under £24,000
293 Whitefield Pendle Under £23,000
294 St Matthew's Preston Under £23,000
295 Church Hyndburn Under £23,000
296 Wensley Fold Blackburn with Darwen Under £23,000
297 Bastwell Blackburn with Darwen Under £22,000
298 Central Hyndburn Under £21,000
299 Bradley Pendle Under £21,000
300 Audley Blackburn with Darwen Under £21,000
301 Daneshouse with Stoneyholme Burnley Under £21,000
Source CACI
Burnley Town Centre, including the Bus Station and St Peter's Health and Leisure Centre, Daneshouse with Stoneyholme Ward, Burnley District
Photograph of Burnley town centre, including the bus station and St Peter's Health and Leisure Centre in the Daneshouse with Stoneyholme ward of Burnley district

The household income data reveal that of the 20 wards with the lowest average figures, seven were in Blackburn with Darwen, and three each were in Hyndburn and Preston. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, Blackpool has only one ward (Clifton) in the bottom 20. Given that the authority had the lowest average income level of any of the 14 Lancashire areas, it is a little surprising that not more of its wards are listed in Table 3. The authority has ward average income levels that are on the whole low and has no significant areas of affluence to help support the overall figure for the authority. The low ward results are however not as low as some of the figures achieved in the core urban areas away from the coast.

Blackburn with Darwen authority contains some of the most and also some of the least affluent areas in the county. It has three of the top 20 wards, but also seven in the bottom 20 wards. This dramatically emphasises the large disparities that can be found within this one authority.

Please note that graphs of the results at the ward level are in the Earnings, Income and Benefits Area Profiles for each of the 12 county districts and two unitary authorities.


This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding.

All enquiries from the press should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk.

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk.

For all enquiries about the county council's services, contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk.