Central government has set a number of priority measures for local government and 16-18 year olds who are not in education, employment or training is indicator number 117.
It is one of the priority measures identified by the Lancashire Partnership as part of the Children and Young People theme of the Lancashire Local Area Agreement.
1. Introduction
2. Definitions and scope
• The Language of NEET
3. Categories of NEET
4. Analysis of NEET in Lancashire
• Analysis by District
• Analysis by Age
• Analysis by Academic Level
• Analysis by Ethnicity
• Analysis by Duration
• Support During NEET
• Barriers to Progress
• Vulnerable Groups
5. The Role of the Young People's Service
6. Strategies and Targets
7. September and January Guarantees
8. NEET Strategy
9. Local Responses to NEET
10. The Impact of the Recession
11. The Voice of Young People
• On Being NEET…
• On the Support They Receive…
• On the Recession…
• On What Should Be Done…
12. Conclusion
Bibliography
This report was initially prepared in December 2009 to inform the work of the county council's Overview and Scrutiny Task Group that was established to examine issues affecting young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET), particularly during the economic recession. This revised edition includes more recent data, reflecting the situation in the Lancashire County Council (12-distrct authority) area at the end of the business year in March 2010.
It sets out the local and national context for NEET, provides an analysis of the composition and characteristics of those in Lancashire who are NEET, outlines the effects of the economic downturn and describes work already being done across the county to mitigate the effects of the recession among our young people.
The report draws on a wide range of sources, including data held by the county's Young People's Service, information provided by other Lancashire County Council services and directorates, central government strategy documents and labour market information provided by CXL Ltd under commissioning arrangements with the Young People's Service. The report also includes the comments of NEET young people themselves, which make clear the human cost and the waste of talent that being NEET represents.
The acronym 'NEET' was coined from the 1999 report of the government Social Exclusion Unit Bridging the Gap: New opportunities for 16-18 year olds not in education, employment or training. Although the term has since been applied in various settings to a wider age range (sometimes up to age 24), the government's preferred use of the term is restricted to 16-18. This more restricted age group is also the only one for which the government has set specific targets for NEET reduction (embodied in National Indicator 117). This report therefore largely follows that convention, although where relevant it addresses issues that apply to the wider age group.
Whilst it provides a useful shorthand for a complex set of factors, the term NEET has acquired nationally some negative connotations, sometimes due unsympathetic coverage in the media. As a recent Centre for Social Justice study makes clear:
'the terminology has become unhelpful; the label… focuses on failure, stigmatises young people, masks the different needs, attitudes and experiences of different young people'
Given the subject matter, references to NEETs throughout this report are inevitable, but they are not intended in any way to reflect those negative connotations.
For reporting purposes, the 16-18 NEET Group is grouped into two categories:
The analyses of NEET given below follow this convention, although it is important to stress that support is offered to all young people who are NEET, regardless of their availability status.
(Note: unless otherwise indicated, the source for all the data cited is Lancashire Young People's Service.)
In line with the situation nationally, the NEET cohort in Lancashire is not static and there is constant movement of individuals into and out of NEET, as young people start or leave jobs, training courses or college places. Smaller changes are accounted for by migrations into and out of the county. Historically, NEET volumes also fluctuate seasonally, reflecting school and college leaving dates, further education and apprenticeship recruitment periods and seasonal employment associated with agriculture, the visitor economy and the pre-Christmas trade. This seasonal fluctuation is illustrated in Figure 1.

The red line in Figure 1 indicates the target set by central government for Lancashire, as it does for all local authorities. Achievement against this target is measured as a three month rolling average from November 2009 to January 2010. Lancashire's failure to meet this target was clearly disappointing, although it was anticipated in the context of the economic downturn and consistent with the regional trend. NEET statistics for Lancashire should also be viewed in the light of a reduced school leaver cohort in 2009, which tended to increase slightly the 16-18 NEET percentage.
Table 1 shows Lancashire's NEET and 'in-learning' performance as at February 2010 in comparison to 10 'statistical neighbours', as well as regional and national averages.
| NEET % | In learning % | |
|---|---|---|
| Bury | 5.3 | 87.0 |
| Calderdale | 9.1 | 81.6 |
| Derbyshire | 7.7 | 79.8 |
| Dudley | 4.7 | 88.1 |
| Kent | 5.1 | 82.8 |
| Northamptonshire | 5.1 | 82.8 |
| Nottinghamshire | 4.8 | 84.0 |
| Sefton | 6.5 | 86.0 |
| Staffordshire | 5.1 | 86.3 |
| Stockton-on-Tees | 11.0 | 79.4 |
| England | 6.4 | 83.4 |
| North West | 7.4 | 83.1 |
| Lancashire | 7.2 | 82.3 |
| Source National Connexions Customer Information System (NCCIS) | ||
The Young People's Service (YPS) works intensively with young people to help them to identify and address their barriers to progression and to minimise the length of time that an individual remains NEET. But whilst YPS takes a lead on NEET among 16-18 year olds, it is important to stress that tackling NEET across the county requires the involvement of network of partners whose commitment to the task is embodied in:
Effective partnership working has helped to produce year-on-year reductions in the overall number and percentage of 16 to 18 year old NEETs in Lancashire. However, in the same way that concentrations of deprivation occur across the county, there are corresponding variations in NEET when factors such as geography, age, gender, ethnicity and levels of qualification are considered. These are analysed below.
Table 2 illustrates that there has been an overall reduction of 270 (10.8%) in 16-18 year old NEETs between two 'snapshot' dates in March 2009 and March 2010.
| NEET 16-18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2009 | March 2010 | |||||
| Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | Total | |
| Hyndburn | 159 | 143 | 302 | 150 | 154 | 304 |
| Burnley | 140 | 141 | 281 | 134 | 133 | 267 |
| Chorley | 74 | 75 | 149 | 63 | 60 | 123 |
| Ribble Valley | 22 | 22 | 44 | 9 | 23 | 32 |
| Wyre | 83 | 100 | 183 | 84 | 66 | 150 |
| Lancaster | 128 | 162 | 290 | 142 | 152 | 294 |
| South Ribble | 74 | 106 | 180 | 72 | 77 | 149 |
| Pendle | 133 | 123 | 256 | 107 | 101 | 208 |
| Preston | 211 | 244 | 455 | 168 | 210 | 378 |
| Rossendale | 57 | 63 | 120 | 63 | 60 | 123 |
| Fylde | 32 | 41 | 73 | 33 | 46 | 79 |
| West Lancashire | 75 | 87 | 162 | 58 | 60 | 118 |
| Total | 1,188 | 1,307 | 2,495 | 1,083 | 1,142 | 2,225 |
| Source Lancashire Young People's Service | ||||||
With the exception of a small number of (semi-rural) locations, the distribution of NEET in Lancashire closely matches that of other deprivation indices, as shown in Figures 2 and 3. Concentrations of NEET can be found in Nelson and Colne, Rossendale, Burnley, Hyndburn, Chorley, South Ribble, Skelmersdale, Preston, Fleetwood, Lancaster and Morecambe.

The age profile of NEETs shows year-on-year decreases among sixteen to eighteen year olds, though with concentrations of NEET among 17 and 18 year olds. This reflects the national trend towards older NEETs and has been the subject of central government appeals to local authorities, Jobcentre Plus and Connexions Service providers for 'a much sharper focus on the older age group in the current rapidly changing labour market'.
For Lancashire, the age profile should be viewed in the context of:
In recent years there has been a slight increase in the qualifications profile of the NEET group across the county. This might be expected, given the increase in attainment of the school leaver population as a whole. However, the average rate of improvement in the attainment of NEETs lags well behind that of the age group as a whole and, as Figures 5 and 6 indicate, the year to March 2010 saw barely any change; a NEET young person is still typically unqualified or poorly qualified and those with a learning difficulty or disability are over-represented within NEET, particularly at age 18 and over. Those with no or low qualifications are also more likely to remain NEET for longer periods.
Nevertheless, at any given time there are significant numbers of young people who are well qualified. In March 2010, for example, 412 (18.5%) held, or were assessed as being capable of achieving*, a Level 2 qualification (equivalent to five good GCSEs). A further 30 (1.3%) held, or were assessed as being capable of achieving, a Level 3 qualification (equivalent to 2 A levels). As one eighteen year old states:
'It's hard to get a job, [I've] tried everywhere – NVQ2 in fitness and 10 GCSEs at A-C and I still can't get one… Told I've not enough experience'.
(*Note that confirmed attainment data is not always made available to the Young People's Service. In many cases, information on attainment potential is provided in Year 11, with consent, by the young person's school).
Ethnicity statistics are based on self-declaration by young people. Table 3 indicates that the ethnic composition of those who are NEET largely mirrors the composition of the same-age population across districts.
| White | Asian | Mixed | Black British | Not known | Gypsy/Roma | Any other | Total | |
| Hyndburn | 264 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 304 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnley | 227 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 267 |
| Chorley | 119 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 123 |
| Ribble Valley | 28 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| Wyre | 140 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
| Lancaster | 273 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 294 |
| South Ribble | 130 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 149 |
| Pendle | 159 | 38 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 208 |
| Preston | 316 | 25 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 378 |
| Rossendale | 107 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 123 |
| Fylde | 64 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 79 |
| West Lancashire | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 118 |
| Total | 1,938 | 128 | 26 | 8 | 119 | 1 | 5 | 2,225 |
| Source Lancashire Young People's Service | ||||||||
The length of time taken for a young person to progress into education, employment or training is dependent on a wide range of factors, including:
| Available NEET | Unavailable NEET | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 4 weeks | 4-8 weeks | 8-12 weeks | Over 12 weeks | Total | Less than 4 weeks | 4-8 weeks | 8-12 weeks | Over 12 weeks | Total | ||
| Hyndburn | 43 | 32 | 29 | 125 | 229 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 66 | 75 | 304 |
| Burnley | 14 | 30 | 33 | 144 | 221 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40 | 46 | 267 |
| Chorley | 16 | 17 | 13 | 42 | 88 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 35 | 123 |
| Ribble Valley | 10 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 32 |
| Wyre | 15 | 15 | 15 | 59 | 104 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 37 | 46 | 150 |
| Lancaster | 37 | 27 | 33 | 156 | 253 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 26 | 41 | 294 |
| South Ribble | 18 | 22 | 18 | 49 | 107 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 37 | 42 | 149 |
| Pendle | 33 | 25 | 14 | 87 | 159 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 49 | 208 |
| Preston | 25 | 40 | 21 | 244 | 330 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 44 | 48 | 378 |
| Rossendale | 12 | 9 | 6 | 77 | 104 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 19 | 123 |
| Fylde | 7 | 16 | 6 | 35 | 64 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 15 | 79 |
| West Lancashire | 25 | 30 | 17 | 15 | 87 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 31 | 118 |
| Total | 255 | 269 | 207 | 1,044 | 1,775 | 17 | 27 | 25 | 381 | 450 | 2,225 |
| Source Lancashire Young People's Service | |||||||||||
Young people who become NEET typically refer themselves to the Young People's Service, or are referred to YPS by other support agencies. An assessment of needs is undertaken and priorities for action agreed. This action plan is regularly reviewed and can be amended as circumstances change. Robust tracking procedures ensure that contact is maintained with the young person, for example to address specific barriers to progression, to help with applications, or to discuss participation in a range of positive activities that may help to build self-esteem and self-confidence and so aid the young person's return to work, training or study.
Where necessary, formal assessment procedures are used, such as the Common Assessment Framework, or an Assessment Relating to Learning Difficulties (known as a 'Section139A Assessment'). These ensure that statutory responsibilities are met and that complex needs can be identified and addressed through multi-agency working.
Targeted support from qualified staff therefore ensures that NEET young people receive the appropriate information, advice and guidance to help them to assess their options and to make informed choices. The vast majority of young people in this situation are keen to 'get fixed up' as soon as possible with appropriate work or learning; most have a strong desire to move on in their lives and most have the maturity to learn from previous experience or poor decisions. But many also face barriers in their personal and family lives that cannot be resolved quickly or easily. Some, for example, will come from homes where there is no family experience of work, training or further education. Others may have left home due to abuse or neglect, some becoming 'sofa surfers' who move between the homes of friends or extended family members. They are likely to find it impossible to 'fit in' with the discipline of a regular work routine, however keen they might be to work and learn. For them even the basics of daily life, such as staying clean, warm and fed can be a major challenge and moving out of NEET can seem a long and difficult journey.
National as well as local data clearly indicate that certain groups are at higher risk than others of becoming and/or remaining NEET. In addition to the issue of vulnerability due to low attainment described above, risk of NEET is also associated with teenage pregnancy and young motherhood, with young people in public care and care leavers, those with a learning difficulty or disability and young offenders. The following statistics illustrate the point:
A national target is that 60% of teenage mothers aged 16-19 will be in some form of learning by 2010. Figure 7 illustrates performance in relation to this goal and clearly highlights the need for further progress.

These figures belie the significant efforts that have been made in the county to reduce the number of teenage pregnancies and to support pregnant teenagers and young mothers - initiatives framed by the County Council's Teenage Pregnancy Strategy. There are many examples of successful partnership working involving the Pregnancy and Parenthood Service, teenage pregnancy midwives, Young People's Workers, Surestart staff, colleges and work-based learning providers. Such collaboration can support a young mother in caring for her child, can build coping strategies and self-confidence and can help the mother to re-engage in learning at a time of her choosing.
Before coming into local authority care, young people will have experienced trauma and disturbance in their lives, often giving rise to a range of social and emotional difficulties. Many will also have had a disrupted education. It is unsurprising therefore that the average academic attainment of those in care at the age of 16 is significantly impaired, compared to the same-age population as a whole. Table 5 illustrates the attainment deficit.
| GCSE attainment | Year 11 students in care | Year 11 cohort |
|---|---|---|
| 1 or more GCSEs Grades A*-G | 78% | 99% |
| 5 or more GCSEs Grades A*-G | 49% | 90% |
| 5 or more GCSEs Grades A*-C | 20% | 62% |
| 5 or more GCSEs Grades A*-C including English and Maths | 12% | 53% |
| Source Virtual School | ||
Similarly, the post-16 progression rate of those in care into further education, jobs or training is approximately 20 percentage points below that of the same-age population as a whole, although improving steadily.

Supporting those in public care to achieve and progress in their lives is a high priority for Lancashire County Council and its partners. The above statistics point to an incremental increase in the 'in-learning' rate among this group over the past two years, but clearly there is more to do if they are to achieve parity with their peers. Nevertheless major steps forward have been made, with actions focused by the findings of the Joint Area Review undertaken in 2008. Examples of progress include:
Nationally, young people with a learning difficulty or disability (LDD) are three times more likely to be NEET than their non-disabled peers. In Lancashire they are similarly vulnerable, though here the difference is slightly less, with LDD young people being approximately twice as likely to be NEET as their non-disabled counterparts. These statistics belie the progress towards inclusion that has been made in recent years, for example in providing:
However, the statistics show that significant barriers still exist. Local research is needed to analyse the situation in more detail, but anecdotal evidence suggests that the underlying factors include: transport and access problems; low aspirations and low expectations of disabled young people and/or their families; and sometimes a poorly-integrated response by agencies and learning providers to the complex needs of individuals, resulting in a 'patchwork' of provision that fails fully to meet the needs or expectations of the learner, leading to impaired progress or early drop-out from a course.


There is currently no firm evidence of the impact of the recession on disabled young people across the county. However, the above statistics show an average 1.8% increase in the NEET rate among those with a learning difficulty or disability during 2009, corresponding to the height of the recession.
A large majority of young offenders are males aged 15 to 17, many of whom have been involved in what are classified as minor crimes involving, for example, theft or criminal damage. Many offenders who become the subject of a community order will have associated difficulties concerning relationships, housing, alcohol or drug misuse or poor mental health; approximately one fifth will be NEET.
A range of agencies contribute to working with young offenders to help them to address the consequences of their actions, reduce re-offending, stay safe and achieve positive outcomes. In many cases, interventions are undertaken or co-ordinated by Lancashire Youth Offending Team, working with partners such as schools, the police, Primary Care Trusts, the Young People's Service or voluntary agencies. The scope of partnership and projects undertaken working is outlined in the Community Safety Agreement 2008-11, published by the Safer Lancashire Board.
Figures 11 and 12 provide geographical and status analyses for those known to YOT for two 'snapshot' periods - March 2010 and March 2009. (Note, however, that the age range in both is wider than for other analyses cited in this report).


Lancashire Young People's Service was formed in April 2007 from a merger of Lancashire's Youth and Community Service with Connexions Lancashire Ltd. Located within the Directorate for Children and Young People and contributing to the objectives of the Children and Young People's Strategic Partnership, the service was designed to deliver an integrated youth support service, providing universal and targeted services to meet the needs of young people aged 11 to 24, in line with the Every Child Matters agenda.
Key principles of service delivery include its person-centred approach, as well as its promotion of effective partnership working in order to meet the often complex needs of individuals. In terms of the NEET agenda, the work includes both preventative and remedial strategies, designed to:
Since 2004 the government has set annual targets for the reduction of NEET among 16 and 17 years olds, with the overall aim of reducing nationally by 2% the number of 16 and 17 year olds in the NEET cohort by 2010, compared to the 2004 baseline. In Lancashire, the targets are embodied in the Local Area Agreement under National Indicator 117, which underpins the partnership approach essential in tackling NEET, through close co-operation and innovative approaches between:
To underpin proactive work with to support NEET 16 and 17 year olds, the Young People's Service also works to a central government target for maintaining contact with this client group (currently 95%). The targets are based on research indicating that, on average, for any group of young people with whom regular contact is lost:
This 'not knowns' formula is significant, since it is used by central government on a monthly basis to provide an adjusted measure of local authorities' NEET performance. Minimising the number of lost contacts is therefore a high priority, not only for the obvious reason that young people with whom contact has been lost cannot be helped back into work or learning, but also because high numbers of 'not knowns' have a disproportionate impact on the recorded NEET rate for a locality. Lancashire has a proven record in undertaking this type of follow-up work, maintaining regular contact with young people who often have chaotic lifestyles and transient residence patterns. This involves high levels of resourcing (for example carrying out home visits), effective networking and data sharing between professionals, and a willingness to try out new engagement strategies.
The September Guarantee is an offer, by the end of September each year, of a place in learning to young people completing compulsory education. The guarantee was implemented nationally in 2007 and was extended to 17 year olds in 2008, to give further learning opportunities to those who enroll on short courses or who discontinue the activity they first chose when leaving school. A 'suitable' offer must be one of the following:
Lancashire's achievement in delivering the September Guarantee has been consistently strong, with 96.1% of the county's school leavers receiving an offer by 30 September. For 17 year olds, 89.7% of the cohort received a suitable offer.
In 2008 the government published a strategy document (See reference 7, Bibliography ) and associated toolkit (reference 8, Bibliography) outlining approaches to be taken by local authorities and partners to reduce NEET. The strategy reinforces the drive to ensure that more young people stay in post-16 learning (including jobs with training), firstly by ensuring excellent universal guidance and support for young people, to minimise the number who disengage. Secondly, it proposes fast and effective targeted support, to help those who do disengage back into learning as quickly as possible.
To achieve these aims, the strategy proposes a range of activity based on four key themes:
Implementing the actions described above enabled Lancashire to make steady progress in reducing NEET in the years preceding the recession, particularly in comparison with the regional out-turn. Even during the worst months of the downturn, initiatives such as those outlined in section 9 below helped to keep the county's NEET rate for 16-18 year olds below the North West average.
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| England | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| North West | 7.9 | 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Lancashire | 7.3 | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| Source Lancashire Young People's Service | |||
However, the challenges of achieving similar rates of progress in the short to medium term are more daunting. This can be attributed partly to the expected 'long tail' of the recession and partly to the diminishing returns inherent in focusing resources on a group of young people who often have complex and intractable difficulties.
Successful responses by the County Council and its partners to the NEET problem can be summarized under the headings of effective networking and communication, early intervention, flexibility and innovation. In many cases, good results are achieved at local level through regular reviews of practice between partners and a concentration on pursuing tried and tested procedures. In other settings, expanded or entirely new provision has been established. Some of these initiatives are described briefly below:
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development definition of a recession is period of two or more consecutive quarters in which Gross Domestic Product declines. The UK economy met this criterion in January 2009, following a 2.1% fall in GDP in the second half of 2008 - the largest six-month decline since 1980. The economy declined further, by a record 4.8%, during 2009, and the UK only began to emerge from recession earlier this year, with a 0.1% growth in the three months to January 2010 (source: ONS).
Despite this official end of the recession in the UK, unemployment in the North West has continued to rise: all-age unemployment in the region rose by 8,000 to 297,000 in the three month period to March 2010.
For Lancashire's young jobseekers, the impact of the economic downturn in 2009-10 is evident in the reduction in the number of vacancies received by CXL (who operate a vacancy and matching service for young people on behalf of the Young People's Service).
These statistics represent a three-year reduction in vacancy volumes of 35.5%. Significantly, three of the occupational areas experiencing the biggest decline in vacancy numbers in the year to 31st October 2009 (construction, motor vehicle work and general labouring) also featured in the top five most popular occupations sought by young people. This fact has implications for the provision and timing of appropriate careers education, information, advice and guidance (CEIAG) to young people. Effective CEIAG not only helps young people to make informed career choices based on their abilities and interests; it also provides them with access to relevant and up to date labour market information, helping them to test their choices against the reality of the opportunities available locally, regionally and nationally.
| Occupational area | % fall |
|---|---|
| Electrical | 79 |
| Construction | 64 |
| Unskilled Service Sector | 50 |
| Motor Vehicle | 49 |
| Labouring | 48 |
| 'Unskilled Service Sector' refers to catering assistants/porters/car valets etc. | |
| Source CXL | |
The decline in the number of vacancies is exacerbated by the frequent mismatch between the skills and qualifications of those who are NEET, and those required by employers. This is more evident at certain times of the year, typically following periods when better qualified young people have progressed into skilled employment or returned to full-time education.
In response to the reduction in vacancy numbers during the past year, CXL Ltd carried out a series of employer engagement visits, targeting localities across Lancashire. A total of 899 employers were visited in the year to March 2010. These visits provided an opportunity to reinforce to employers the benefits of employing young people, and to gauge the state of the youth labour market in the light of the recession. The response from most employers has been that they are just able to maintain output and retain their existing staff, but that they do not envisage being able to recruit new workers until the economy improves.
Comments were invited for inclusion in this report from NEET young people in various locations across the county. They capture the frustrations, regrets and ideas of a diverse group of individuals, trying to make sense of their situation:
It's rubbish! You have no money, nothing to do. You have less experience than everyone else, so you can't get work!
I've missed out by not going to school, getting no education
I'm fed up not being able to get a job
The only jobs are for those people with loads of GCSEs
I want to be a fork lift driver and there's no training for that unless you pay, but I've got no money, 'cos I can't get a job.
I'm fed up – I have a really good CV and have taken it to all the shops in Chorley and none get back to me – that's worse than being told they've no jobs
I have done lots of things and look in the paper all the time but don't have any luck
Every time I come in there seem to be fewer jobs
I can't find nowhere that I can work in a garage… I'm good at mechanics and I want to work, but I can't get someone to take me on
I left college because I thought there would be more jobs out there. I wish I hadn't now
It's good to get support
Good! It's been excellent
Had a lot of help from Connexions and the Jobcentre
Young People's Service do everything they can, but there aren't any jobs for me
It affects everyone you know, it affects your future
Our parents are financially less stable
The credit crunch hasn't had much impact because things were bad anyway
It's meant there aren't any jobs for me
Someone I know has been made redundant and they are struggling to keep their house running
Parents have less money – we're shopping on a budget
There isn't enough money coming in to pay the bills and mum and dad are fighting a lot
Would love to be back at work
Get as much education as you can in school
NEETs could talk to others about how hard it is being unemployed - to stop it happening to them
Provide more activities and trips
Fill the 18-19 gap, for those who have done two years at college but can't access free Adult College courses
Give us things to look forward to, like a day out or something
Even before the effects of the recession began to be felt, the imperative to respond to the NEET agenda, brought into focus by national and local targets, led to the development of new approaches among key partners across the county. These included a broader, shared ownership of NEET 'problem' through the framework of the Local Area Agreement, through better systems for the exchange of information using formal data sharing protocols and partnership agreements, and through the introduction of new ways of working designed to target resources more effectively to meet local needs.
Work has also progressed in the area of NEET prevention, with new strategies being employed in schools, colleges and work-based learning to monitor the risk factors that may lead to NEET and to work with students before they drop out, or fail to reach their full academic potential. Young people's access to high quality information, advice and guidance information continues to improve through developments such as Lancashire's Area-Wide Prospectus and the new Young People's Service website.
For the longer term, NEET prevention is further aided by the statutory requirement for secondary schools to provide a careers education programme for all students from Year 7. Also, the ongoing 14-19 education reforms, including the introduction of 17 Diplomas and new Foundation Learning arrangements, mean that there is a widening range of options for young people who are unmotivated by the traditional academic progression routes offered by GCSEs and A levels. Further proposals to increase the quality and flexibility of vocational education were announced in the new administration's programme for government, published in May 2010 (18).
For those who do become NEET, the examples cited in section 9 illustrate the increasing range of flexible learning opportunities and positive activities that can help to provide mentoring support, positive role models, new skills and a stepping-stone to a job, training place or college course.
Despite these advances, the reality of declining vacancy numbers and the rising age profile of NEETs means that further action is likely to be needed if the trend is to be reversed. And while only a buoyant economy can deliver sustained levels of high employment, past experience suggests that much can be done to mitigate the impact of recession young people and to give them the skills and experience they will need to take advantage of economic recovery.
Specifically, it would be useful to explore:
Developments in these areas would help in addressing many of the immediate challenges of NEET, would help to grow the talents of the county's young people and would build economic and social resilience for the longer term.
1. Audit Commission (2009): When it comes to the crunch... how councils are responding to the recession
2. Cabinet Office (2009): Jobs of the Future
3. Centre for Local Economic Strategies Bulletin No 55 (2009): NEET Strategy: Raising the participation age - an opportunity for all?
4. Centre for Social Justice/Local Government Association (2009): Hidden Talents: re-engaging young people
5. Confederation of British Industry (2008): Towards a NEET solution: tackling underachievement in young people
6. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2009): Building Britain's Future: new industry, new jobs
7. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008): Reducing the number of young people not in education, employment or training: the strategy
8. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008): Reducing the number of young people not in education, employment or training: NEET toolkit
9. HM Treasury (2006): Leitch review of skills: Prosperity for all in the global economy - world class skills
10. Lancashire County Council (2009 rev): Lancashire 14-19 Strategy for Learning
11. Lancashire County Council (2009): Common Assessment Framework (CAF) and Lead Professional (LP)
12. Lancashire County Council (2009): Lancashire Children and Young People's Plan - 2009-2012
13. Lancashire County Council (2009): Lancashire Local Area Agreement 2008-11 (2009 Refresh)
14. Reed in Partnership (2009): False starts: restoring hope, dignity and opportunity to young people
15. Youth Access (2009): The impact of the recession on young eople and on their needs for advice and counselling services
16. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2009): Beverley Hughes MP: Ministerial letter to Directors of Children's Services
17. Safer Lancashire Board (2008): Community Safety Agreement 2008-11
18. HM Government (2010): The Coalition: our programme for government